Spine deformity · 2020
Use of intraoperative navigation for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery is safe to consider.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moore Harold G, Samuel Andre M, Burroughs Patrick J, Pathak Neil, Tuason Dominick A, Grauer Jonathan N
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The use of image-guided stereotactic navigation is increasing in use in treating AIS; however, no studies have investigated perioperative outcomes and short-term adverse events compared with non-navigated procedures. The aim of the present study is to use a large national pediatric database to assess the rate of utilization of intraoperative navigation in pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to compare thirty-day outcomes of navigated vs. non-navigated surgery.
METHODS: The NSQIP-Pediatric database was queried for cases of posterior fusion for AIS. Patients were stratified by whether or not a concurrent code for stereotactic navigation was used (CPT 61,783). Year of procedure, demographics, comorbidities, operative variables and perioperative adverse outcomes were abstracted and assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 12,739 non-navigated patients and 340 navigated patients were identified. The use of navigation increased from 0.5% of cases in 2012 to 5.2% of cases in 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and number of levels fused did not differ between navigated and non-navigated patients. Navigated cases were on average 41 min longer than non-navigated cases (268.6 vs. 309.6 min p < 0.001), with 9.84% more cases requiring transfusion (65.0% vs 75.6%, p < 0.001). Hospital stay for navigated cases was an average of 0.4 days shorter (3.9 days vs 4.3 days, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, navigated cases had higher odds of prolonged surgery (OR = 2.13, p < 0.001) and lower odds of prolonged length of stay (OR = 0.28, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although the use of navigation for AIS posterior fusion was associated with longer operative time, post-operative hospital stay was shorter and other perioperative adverse outcomes were not significantly different between groups.
METHODS: The NSQIP-Pediatric database was queried for cases of posterior fusion for AIS. Patients were stratified by whether or not a concurrent code for stereotactic navigation was used (CPT 61,783). Year of procedure, demographics, comorbidities, operative variables and perioperative adverse outcomes were abstracted and assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 12,739 non-navigated patients and 340 navigated patients were identified. The use of navigation increased from 0.5% of cases in 2012 to 5.2% of cases in 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and number of levels fused did not differ between navigated and non-navigated patients. Navigated cases were on average 41 min longer than non-navigated cases (268.6 vs. 309.6 min p < 0.001), with 9.84% more cases requiring transfusion (65.0% vs 75.6%, p < 0.001). Hospital stay for navigated cases was an average of 0.4 days shorter (3.9 days vs 4.3 days, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, navigated cases had higher odds of prolonged surgery (OR = 2.13, p < 0.001) and lower odds of prolonged length of stay (OR = 0.28, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although the use of navigation for AIS posterior fusion was associated with longer operative time, post-operative hospital stay was shorter and other perioperative adverse outcomes were not significantly different between groups.