DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.200
Functional Connectivity Analysis and Prediction of Pain Relief in Association with Spinal Decompression Surgery.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Although spinal decompression surgery is an effective treatment for myelopathy-induced upper limb pain, some postoperative patients suffer from residual pain in spite of adequate decompression. However, the neural mechanism underlying the poor outcome of pain relief is still unclear. The goal of this study was to explore the brain mechanisms involved in the poor recovery of upper limb pain after the spinal decompression surgery by using functional connectivity (FC) analysis.
METHODS
In this cross-sectional study, 17 patients who underwent cervical spinal decompression surgery were included. Functional MRI (fMRI) during a tactile stimulus for each hand was performed at 1 day before and 7 days after the surgery. In total, 34 fMRI scans (17 left and right upper limbs, respectively) were obtained before and after the surgery, respectively. The patients were divided into poor-recovery and good-recovery groups, and then we searched for the FC that was related to poor-recovery.
RESULTS
The poor-recovery group (n = 15) showed significantly stronger connectivity between the postcentral gyrus (postCG) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) than the good-recovery group (n = 12) preoperatively. When the cutoff value of the preoperative FC between the left postCG and right middle frontal gyrus included in DLPFC was >0.17, the sensitivity and specificity for poor recovery were 73% and 75%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that FC between the postCG and DLPFC may be a predictor of pain relief. This result suggested that assessing FC can lead to more informed surgical interventions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.