European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
A safe, novel and ingenious method for autogenous bone graft storage in spine surgery with constrained resources - operative site as the bone bank.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bains Ravi S, Hui Si Jian, Sharma Veushj, Kumar Niten, Kumar Laranya, Singh Nirmal, Rai Amarjit Singh, Kumar Naresh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to establish whether the bone graft harvested and stored in the surgical wound by our novel technique is safe, reproducible and preserves the viability of the graft. In doing so, it promises successful bony fusion in spine and orthopaedic surgeries.
METHODS: A prospective clinical case series was conducted for autogenous bone graft storage in complex spine surgeries requiring staged procedures, in resource constrained settings. The bone graft harvested was morselized, wrapped in moist sterile gauze and stored in the paraspinal gutter within the operative site. Thereafter, the surgical wound was easily closed without tension. During the second stage surgery, the stored bone was retrieved and mixed with more autologous/allogenic bone (if necessary) and appropriately laid at fusion sites. Bacterial samples were sent before implantation.
RESULTS: 16 complex spinal deformity patients who underwent surgery in a resource constrained hospital over a period of 5 years were included. Duration between both stages was within 2 weeks. All patients showed successful fusion, with mean follow-up of 2.6 years. There were no cases of deep or systemic infection in our series. Surgeons found harvesting, storing and retrieval of graft to be straightforward.
CONCLUSION: The operative site provides an ideal, safe and reproducible location for bone graft storage for staged surgeries conducted in resource constrained situations. The osteogenic potential of the autogenous bone graft is retained. This technique can be extrapolated to other orthopaedic surgeries conducted under resource limited environments like in surgical camps or combat medical facilities.
METHODS: A prospective clinical case series was conducted for autogenous bone graft storage in complex spine surgeries requiring staged procedures, in resource constrained settings. The bone graft harvested was morselized, wrapped in moist sterile gauze and stored in the paraspinal gutter within the operative site. Thereafter, the surgical wound was easily closed without tension. During the second stage surgery, the stored bone was retrieved and mixed with more autologous/allogenic bone (if necessary) and appropriately laid at fusion sites. Bacterial samples were sent before implantation.
RESULTS: 16 complex spinal deformity patients who underwent surgery in a resource constrained hospital over a period of 5 years were included. Duration between both stages was within 2 weeks. All patients showed successful fusion, with mean follow-up of 2.6 years. There were no cases of deep or systemic infection in our series. Surgeons found harvesting, storing and retrieval of graft to be straightforward.
CONCLUSION: The operative site provides an ideal, safe and reproducible location for bone graft storage for staged surgeries conducted in resource constrained situations. The osteogenic potential of the autogenous bone graft is retained. This technique can be extrapolated to other orthopaedic surgeries conducted under resource limited environments like in surgical camps or combat medical facilities.