World neurosurgery · 2024
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways in Pediatric Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hey Grace, Mehkri Yusuf, Mehkri Ilyas, Boatright Samuel, Duncan Avery, Patel Karina, Gendreau Julian, Chandra Vyshak
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pediatric spinal fusion surgery is a complex procedure that poses challenges in perioperative management. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach is an evidence-based, multidisciplinary strategy to optimize patient care in an individualized, multidisciplinary way. Despite the benefits of ERAS protocol implementation, the role of ERAS in pediatric spine surgery remains understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the current literature regarding pediatric spinal surgery ERAS protocols and their ability to decrease the length of stay, pain, time-to-stand, and complications.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan (version 5.4).
RESULTS: Seventeen studies totaling 2733 patients were included in this analysis. Patients treated in an ERAS protocol had significant reductions in length of stay (P < 0.001), time-to-stand (P < 0.001), total complications (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol implementation can significantly enhance outcomes for pediatric patients receiving spinal surgery. Consequently, ERAS protocols have the potential to lower healthcare expenses, increase access, and set a new standard of care. Future research should be conducted to expand pediatric ERAS protocols to a diverse range of spinal pathologies and assess the long-term advantages of this practice.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane's RevMan (version 5.4).
RESULTS: Seventeen studies totaling 2733 patients were included in this analysis. Patients treated in an ERAS protocol had significant reductions in length of stay (P < 0.001), time-to-stand (P < 0.001), total complications (P = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol implementation can significantly enhance outcomes for pediatric patients receiving spinal surgery. Consequently, ERAS protocols have the potential to lower healthcare expenses, increase access, and set a new standard of care. Future research should be conducted to expand pediatric ERAS protocols to a diverse range of spinal pathologies and assess the long-term advantages of this practice.