The Role of Elbow Tender Point Examination in the Diagnosis of Lateral Epicondylitis.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify sensitivity and specificity of the tender points and demonstrate how variability in case definition impacts prevalence of lateral epicondylitis (LE).

METHODS

Baseline data analyzed from 1216 workers from the WISTAH study, a multicenter prospective cohort study of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. All workers completed computerized questionnaires, structured interviews, and two independent physical examinations in accordance with an established protocol.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LE differed based on case definition ranging from 4.7% to 12.1%. Sensitivity was low for tender points 1 to 4 ranging from 6.8% to 34.6%. Specificity was high for tender points 1 to 4 ranging from 95.2% to 97.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of lateral epicondylitis differs markedly based on case definition used, ranging more than two-fold. Standardization of a case definition is essential to allow for comparisons across studies.