MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2024.2419845

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2024

Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy for temporomandibular joint hypermobility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhou Gehong, Hu Yingshun, Wang Sumin

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy versus placebo and other active interventions, like autologous blood injection (ABI) and botulinum toxin (BTX), in improving the outcomes of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) hypermobility.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane CENTRAL library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) . Maximal mouth opening (MMO), pain, and frequency of dislocations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were included. In comparison with placebo, dextrose prolotherapy was associated with significantly reduced pain and MMO. Comparison of dextrose with ABI revealed no significant difference in MMO. Qualitative analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes in patients who received dextrose prolotherapy and BTX.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence suggests that dextrose prolotherapy may reduce MMO and improve pain scores compared to placebo in patients with TMJ hypermobility. Low-quality evidence also suggests that there may be minimal difference in outcomes between dextrose vs ABI and BTX.

Для цитирования: Zhou Gehong, Hu Yingshun, Wang Sumin. Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy for temporomandibular joint hypermobility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2024. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2024.2419845.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.