MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4067/s0034-98872006001000005

Медицинская библиотека · Revista medica de Chile · 2006

[Cat-scratch disease. Review of eight adult patients hospitalized for fever or adenopathy].

Eymin Gonzalo, Zapata Antonio, Andrade Maricarmen, Aizman Andrés, Rojas Luis, Rabagliati Ricardo

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cat-scratch disease is common among children. Among adults the disease is less often considered in the differential diagnosis of enlarged lymph nodes and fever.

AIM: To report the clinical and laboratory features of eight patients with cat-scratch disease.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Review of the medical records of eight patients (aged 22 to 57 years, six males) with a serological diagnosis of cat-scratch disease (an IgG titer over 1:256, by immunofluorescence).

RESULTS

Only five patients recalled having had contact with cats. Seven had fever and weight loss. Six had excessive sweating and five had chills. Seven had painfully enlarged lymph nodes mainly in submandibular and axillary regions. All had an increased C reactive protein and six had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Five had leukocytosis and four an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase. The disease subsided in all, even in one patient that did not receive antimicrobials.

CONCLUSIONS

Cat-scratch disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adult patients with lymph adenitis and fever.

Для цитирования: Eymin Gonzalo, Zapata Antonio, Andrade Maricarmen, Aizman Andrés, Rojas Luis, Rabagliati Ricardo. [Cat-scratch disease. Review of eight adult patients hospitalized for fever or adenopathy].. Revista medica de Chile. 2006. DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872006001000005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.