Journal of pediatric orthopedics · 2008
Shear stress in epiphyseal growth plate is a risk factor for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zupanc Oskar, Krizancic Miran, Daniel Matej, Mavcic Blaz, Antolic Vane, Iglic Ales, Kralj-Iglic Veronika
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Slipping of the capital femoral epiphysis is an important orthopaedic problem of early adolescence. Many hypotheses about its etiology have been examined, yet the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated. We examined elevated shear stress in the epiphyseal growth plate and elevated contact hip stress exerted on the femoral head as risk factors for slipping of the capital femoral epiphysis.
METHODS: Two groups of hips were compared: a group of 100 hips contralateral to the slipped ones and a group of 70 age- and gender-matched healthy hips. The characteristics of individual hips were incorporated by means of geometrical parameters determined from standard anteroposterior radiographs. Shear stress was calculated by using a mathematical model where the femoral neck was considered to function as an elastic rod. Contact hip stress was calculated by the HIPSTRESS method.
RESULTS: Hips contralateral to the slipped ones had higher average shear stress (0.81 vs 0.51 MPa; P < 0.001) and more vertically inclined physeal angle (55.4 vs 63.2 degrees.; P < 0.001) in comparison to healthy hips. Shear stress in the contralateral hips to the slipped ones remained significantly higher even when normalized to the body weight (1400 vs 1060 Pa/N; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average contact hip stress (1.86 vs 1.74 MPa; P = 0.145).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated shear stress, but not elevated contact stress, is a risk factor for slipping of the capital femoral epiphysis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (prognostic study, case-control study).
METHODS: Two groups of hips were compared: a group of 100 hips contralateral to the slipped ones and a group of 70 age- and gender-matched healthy hips. The characteristics of individual hips were incorporated by means of geometrical parameters determined from standard anteroposterior radiographs. Shear stress was calculated by using a mathematical model where the femoral neck was considered to function as an elastic rod. Contact hip stress was calculated by the HIPSTRESS method.
RESULTS: Hips contralateral to the slipped ones had higher average shear stress (0.81 vs 0.51 MPa; P < 0.001) and more vertically inclined physeal angle (55.4 vs 63.2 degrees.; P < 0.001) in comparison to healthy hips. Shear stress in the contralateral hips to the slipped ones remained significantly higher even when normalized to the body weight (1400 vs 1060 Pa/N; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average contact hip stress (1.86 vs 1.74 MPa; P = 0.145).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated shear stress, but not elevated contact stress, is a risk factor for slipping of the capital femoral epiphysis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (prognostic study, case-control study).