Posterior kyphectomy for myelomeningocele with anterior placement of fixation: a retrospective review.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Kyphosis in myelomeningocele is a rare and difficult problem. Many strategies have been used with no single procedure universally agreed on. Techniques involving anterior and posterior fixation may provide better fusion.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe a novel procedure for anteroposterior kyphectomy in patients with myelomeningocele. Apical posterior kyphectomy is followed by the insertion of two rods distally into the vertebral bodies and sacrum. Sublaminar wires are placed superiorly and the kyphosis is reduced by sequential tightening. We determined kyphosis correction and intraoperative blood loss for this new procedure.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients (average age, 7.6 years [range, 2-17 years]) who underwent apical kyphectomy from 1982 to 2008. Charts were examined and radiographs measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at final followup. Followup averaged 6.4 years (range, 0-14 years) with 19 patients having at least 2 years of followup.
RESULTS
Kyphosis decreased from a mean of 123° (range, 79°-163°) preoperatively to 40° (range, 13°-92°) immediately postoperatively and was a mean of 60° (range, 14°-126°) at final followup. Operating time was 248 minutes (range, 180-345 minutes), estimated blood loss was 765 mL (range, 140-2100 mL), and length of stay was 14 days (range, 1-57 days). Ten of the 22 patients had complications with eight requiring reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS
This anteroposterior kyphectomy provided a high level of kyphosis correction, which was largely maintained over the study period. Blood loss, surgical time, and complication rates were acceptable as compared with other techniques reported in the literature.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.