Southern medical journal · 2019
Native Joint Septic Arthritis: Comparison of Outcomes with Medical and Surgical Management.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harada Kaoru, McConnell Ian, DeRycke Eric C, Holleck Jürgen L, Gupta Shaili
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differences in the outcomes of native joint septic arthritis (SA) in adults, based on medical versus surgical management.
METHODS: A 10-year retrospective single-center study was conducted of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015 with a diagnosis of SA to compare outcomes based on the management approach taken: medical (bedside closed-needle joint aspiration) versus surgical (arthrotomy/arthroscopy). Evaluated outcomes included joint recovery, time to recovery, length of stay, disposition to home versus rehabilitation unit, recurrence of SA in the same joint, and mortality.
RESULTS: Of 118 confirmed cases of SA, 48 were in prosthetic joints and 70 were in native joints, and 61 met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one (67%) patients received surgery, and 20 (33%) received closed-needle aspiration. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term outcomes between the two groups at 12 months. Patients managed medically were more likely to experience full recovery at 3 months and were less likely to need short-term rehabilitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical management with closed-needle aspiration may be an adequate approach to the treatment of native joint infections.
METHODS: A 10-year retrospective single-center study was conducted of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015 with a diagnosis of SA to compare outcomes based on the management approach taken: medical (bedside closed-needle joint aspiration) versus surgical (arthrotomy/arthroscopy). Evaluated outcomes included joint recovery, time to recovery, length of stay, disposition to home versus rehabilitation unit, recurrence of SA in the same joint, and mortality.
RESULTS: Of 118 confirmed cases of SA, 48 were in prosthetic joints and 70 were in native joints, and 61 met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one (67%) patients received surgery, and 20 (33%) received closed-needle aspiration. There was no statistically significant difference in long-term outcomes between the two groups at 12 months. Patients managed medically were more likely to experience full recovery at 3 months and were less likely to need short-term rehabilitation.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical management with closed-needle aspiration may be an adequate approach to the treatment of native joint infections.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnkle JointAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthritis, InfectiousArthrocentesisArthroscopyCandidiasisDrainageElbow JointFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHip JointHospitalizationHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesShoulder JointStaphylococcal InfectionsSternoclavicular JointStreptococcal InfectionsTertiary Care CentersWrist Joint