European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
Bracing in severe skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does a holding strategy change the surgical plan?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohrt-Nissen Søren, Heegaard M, Andersen Thomas, Gehrchen M, Dahl B, Tøndevold N
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the changes in flexibility during night-time bracing in skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with curves in the surgical range.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included a consecutive cohort of 89 AIS patients with curves ≥ 45° and an estimated growth potential. All patients were eventually treated with fusion surgery, and all patients had side-bending radiographs prior to both bracing and surgery. Curves were classified as structural or non-structural curves according to Lenke at both timepoints.
RESULTS: The main curve progressed by a mean of 12 ± 10° and the secondary curve by 8 ± 8°. Flexibility of the main curve decreased from 50 ± 19% to 44 ± 19% (p = 0.001) and the underlying curve from 85 ± 21% to 77 ± 22% (p = 0.005). In 69 patients (79%), the Lenke category did not progress during bracing. In 14 patients (15%), the progression in Lenke type occurred in the thoracic region (i.e., Lenke type 1 to type 2), while six patients (7%) progressed in the lumbar region (i.e., type 1 to type 3). In the 69 patients that did not progress, we found that the last touched vertebra moved distally by one or two levels in 26 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe that curve flexibility decreases during bracing in severe AIS. However, this had only a modest impact on the surgical strategy. Bracing as a holding strategy can be applied, but the risk of losing flexibility in the lumbar spine should be outweighed against the risks of premature fusion surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included a consecutive cohort of 89 AIS patients with curves ≥ 45° and an estimated growth potential. All patients were eventually treated with fusion surgery, and all patients had side-bending radiographs prior to both bracing and surgery. Curves were classified as structural or non-structural curves according to Lenke at both timepoints.
RESULTS: The main curve progressed by a mean of 12 ± 10° and the secondary curve by 8 ± 8°. Flexibility of the main curve decreased from 50 ± 19% to 44 ± 19% (p = 0.001) and the underlying curve from 85 ± 21% to 77 ± 22% (p = 0.005). In 69 patients (79%), the Lenke category did not progress during bracing. In 14 patients (15%), the progression in Lenke type occurred in the thoracic region (i.e., Lenke type 1 to type 2), while six patients (7%) progressed in the lumbar region (i.e., type 1 to type 3). In the 69 patients that did not progress, we found that the last touched vertebra moved distally by one or two levels in 26 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe that curve flexibility decreases during bracing in severe AIS. However, this had only a modest impact on the surgical strategy. Bracing as a holding strategy can be applied, but the risk of losing flexibility in the lumbar spine should be outweighed against the risks of premature fusion surgery.