MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/1097-0096(200103/04)29:3<140::aid-jcu1013>3.0.co;2-r

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2001

Gray-scale sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy in cat-scratch disease.

Ridder G J, Richter B, Disko U, Sander A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize the gray-scale sonographic findings in the lymph nodes of patients with cat-scratch disease (CSD).

METHODS

We analyzed the sonograms of cervical lymph nodes in 41 patients with proven CSD between January 1997 and October 1999.

RESULTS

A total of 222 involved lymph nodes were detected. Involved nodes were most commonly found in the middle cervical (58%), parotid (37%), upper cervical (37%), and submandibular (17%) regions. We found acute, chronic, or abscessed lymphadenopathy in 63%, 12%, and 24% of patients, respectively. The size of involved lymph nodes ranged from 12 x 4 mm to 35 x 26 mm. The largest involved node had a short axis/long axis ratio of 0.5 or more in 61% of patients. Useful features for the differential diagnosis included markedly decreased echogenicity (100%), normal surrounding tissues (100%), and the presence of an echogenic hilum (76%). Posterior sound enhancement was significantly associated with larger and abscessed lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the absence of a specific sonographic finding for CSD, gray-scale sonography can provide clues to the diagnosis of CSD in the proper clinical setting.

Для цитирования: Ridder G J, Richter B, Disko U, Sander A. Gray-scale sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy in cat-scratch disease.. Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU. 2001. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0096(200103/04)29:3<140::aid-jcu1013>3.0.co;2-r.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.