Acta neurochirurgica · 2019
Range of voluntary neck motility predicts outcome of pallidal DBS for cervical dystonia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huh Ryoong, Chung Moonyoung
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of pallidal deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) for cervical dystonia has been extensively described, but controversies exist about which prognostic factor is clinically useful. We previously reported that classification of tonic- or phasic-type cervical dystonia is useful for predicting clinical prognosis; however, the approach used by physicians to distinguish between the two types remains subjective.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic factor of GPi DBS for cervical dystonia.
METHODS: By identifying distributions of range of motion scores between phasic- and tonic-type cervical dystonia, a new prognostic factor group was developed based on whether the patients could voluntarily move their head to the opposite side against dystonic motions. The prognosis for GPi DBS in the two groups was analyzed according to the time sequence.
RESULTS: Patients who were able to move their head past the midline had a better long-term prognosis after GPi DBS than did those who could not. In the early post-operative phase, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: A range of voluntary neck motility with respect to the midline is an objective factor that is useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with cervical dystonia. This result renders needs for future study addressing neuroplastic changes in the brain network caused by GPi DBS.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic factor of GPi DBS for cervical dystonia.
METHODS: By identifying distributions of range of motion scores between phasic- and tonic-type cervical dystonia, a new prognostic factor group was developed based on whether the patients could voluntarily move their head to the opposite side against dystonic motions. The prognosis for GPi DBS in the two groups was analyzed according to the time sequence.
RESULTS: Patients who were able to move their head past the midline had a better long-term prognosis after GPi DBS than did those who could not. In the early post-operative phase, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: A range of voluntary neck motility with respect to the midline is an objective factor that is useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with cervical dystonia. This result renders needs for future study addressing neuroplastic changes in the brain network caused by GPi DBS.