Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2018
Benefit of Temporomandibular Joint Lavage With Intra-Articular Steroids Versus Lavage Alone in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Antonarakis Gregory S, Courvoisier Delphine S, Hanquinet Sylviane, Dhouib Amira, Carlomagno Raffaella, Hofer Michaël, Scolozzi Paolo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate, in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the effect of lavage with or without intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection on clinical temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs and symptoms of inflammation and changes in acute inflammation as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (mean age, 13.6 ± 4.0 yr) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis participating in a large prospective juvenile inflammatory rheumatism cohort study (JIRcohorte) were included in this study. Clinical history, examination, and MRI were carried out at baseline and 6 months after intervention, if any. Twenty-one patients underwent lavage and IACS injection in at least 1 TMJ, 8 patients underwent lavage of at least 1 TMJ, and 12 patients were followed with no intervention. Outcomes measured were maximal mouth opening, Helkimo dysfunction index scores, pain intensity, and acute inflammation as assessed using MRI.
RESULTS: All groups showed a mean increase in mouth opening and mean decrease in pain intensity. The mean Helkimo clinical dysfunction score decreased for the 2 intervention groups but not for the control group. The mean Helkimo anamnestic dysfunction score decreased for the lavage with IACS group but not for the lavage-only group. The only statistically relevant difference was found for the Helkimo anamnestic dysfunction score comparing the lavage-only with the lavage with IACS group, with a more positive effect found in the lavage with IACS group. More than 50% of joints in each group showed no change at MRI examination. Joints with lavage and ICAS injection showed better improvement than joints that had lavage only or no intervention.
CONCLUSION: TMJ lavage with or without IACS injection cannot be claimed to systematically decrease pain, increase mouth opening, or resolve acute inflammation. Despite a tendency for improvement, response to this treatment is very patient dependent and can be determined by an array of other variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (mean age, 13.6 ± 4.0 yr) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis participating in a large prospective juvenile inflammatory rheumatism cohort study (JIRcohorte) were included in this study. Clinical history, examination, and MRI were carried out at baseline and 6 months after intervention, if any. Twenty-one patients underwent lavage and IACS injection in at least 1 TMJ, 8 patients underwent lavage of at least 1 TMJ, and 12 patients were followed with no intervention. Outcomes measured were maximal mouth opening, Helkimo dysfunction index scores, pain intensity, and acute inflammation as assessed using MRI.
RESULTS: All groups showed a mean increase in mouth opening and mean decrease in pain intensity. The mean Helkimo clinical dysfunction score decreased for the 2 intervention groups but not for the control group. The mean Helkimo anamnestic dysfunction score decreased for the lavage with IACS group but not for the lavage-only group. The only statistically relevant difference was found for the Helkimo anamnestic dysfunction score comparing the lavage-only with the lavage with IACS group, with a more positive effect found in the lavage with IACS group. More than 50% of joints in each group showed no change at MRI examination. Joints with lavage and ICAS injection showed better improvement than joints that had lavage only or no intervention.
CONCLUSION: TMJ lavage with or without IACS injection cannot be claimed to systematically decrease pain, increase mouth opening, or resolve acute inflammation. Despite a tendency for improvement, response to this treatment is very patient dependent and can be determined by an array of other variables.