MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000001520

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2016

Robert W. Williams: Forgotten Pioneer of Spinal Мicrosurgery.

Stone James L, Arnold Paul M, Chowdhry Shakeel A, Charbel Fady

БиографияИсторическая статьяСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: In the 1970's many neurosurgeons gradually adapted microsurgical techniques to spine surgery as the benefits of magnification, illumination, and use of fine instruments in cranial surgery became apparent. In the early 1970 s, Robert W. Williams, а neurosurgeon in private practice in Las Vegas, Nevada, independently began to devise spinal microneurosurgical techniques with the goal of improving surgical outcome in lumbar and cervical surgery. Much of his initial work with microlumbar discectomies and microcervical foraminotomies was presented at annual meetings of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons in the 1970s and 1980s. An outsider to organized academic neurosurgery, Dг. Williams found his work was received cautiously and with significant skepticism. He found the orthopedic spine surgery community and journals more receptive, thus much of his earlier work was published in the orthopedic literature. This resulted in an orthopedic and neurosurgical following which was unique at that time. Dr. William's interesting career and contribution to spinal microsurgery is outlined, demonstrating the contributions to surgery, both neurological and orthopedic, that can be achieved by a neurosurgeon in private practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Для цитирования: Stone James L, Arnold Paul M, Chowdhry Shakeel A, Charbel Fady. Robert W. Williams: Forgotten Pioneer of Spinal Мicrosurgery.. Spine. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001520.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.