Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023
Does intrathecal baclofen therapy decrease the progression of hip displacement in young patients with cerebral palsy?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Asma Ali, Ulusaloglu Armagan Can, Howard Jason J, Rogers Kenneth J, McManus Maura, Miller Freeman, Shrader M Wade
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the effects of intrathecal baclofen pump (ITBP) therapy on hip dysplasia in young patients with cerebral palsy (CP).
METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort series of prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria were all patients with CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV or V who underwent ITBP placement under 8 years old with at least 5 years of follow-up. Thirty-four patients were matched to a control group of 71 patients based on GMFCS level, motor type, medical comorbidities, worst hip migration percentage at ITBP placement, age, and Modified Ashworth scale scores. Patients were followed for at least 5 years or until they had hip reconstructive surgery. The primary outcome was the development of hip displacement as measured by the migration percentage at the latest follow-up or the preoperative migration percentage before hip reconstruction.
RESULTS: The migration percentage at last follow-up was not statistically different between groups (ITBP: 36.2%, non-ITBP: 44.4%, p = 0.14). The rates of future preventative, reconstructive, and recurrent hip surgery were not different between groups.
INTERPRETATION: The use of ITBP as an early treatment of spasticity did not alter the natural history of progressive hip displacement in non-ambulatory patients with CP and hip displacement is likely multifactorial, not solely due to spasticity.
METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort series of prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria were all patients with CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV or V who underwent ITBP placement under 8 years old with at least 5 years of follow-up. Thirty-four patients were matched to a control group of 71 patients based on GMFCS level, motor type, medical comorbidities, worst hip migration percentage at ITBP placement, age, and Modified Ashworth scale scores. Patients were followed for at least 5 years or until they had hip reconstructive surgery. The primary outcome was the development of hip displacement as measured by the migration percentage at the latest follow-up or the preoperative migration percentage before hip reconstruction.
RESULTS: The migration percentage at last follow-up was not statistically different between groups (ITBP: 36.2%, non-ITBP: 44.4%, p = 0.14). The rates of future preventative, reconstructive, and recurrent hip surgery were not different between groups.
INTERPRETATION: The use of ITBP as an early treatment of spasticity did not alter the natural history of progressive hip displacement in non-ambulatory patients with CP and hip displacement is likely multifactorial, not solely due to spasticity.