Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2013
The effect of kyphoplasty parameters on the dynamic load transfer within the lumbar spine considering the response of a bio-realistic spine segment.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsouknidas Alexander, Savvakis Savvas, Asaniotis Yiannis, Anagnostidis Kleovoulos, Lontos Antonios, Michailidis Nikolaos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With an increasing prevalence of osteoporosis, physicians have to optimize treatment of relevant vertebral compression fractures, which have significant impact on the quality of life in the elder population. Retrospective clinical studies suggest that kyphoplasty, despite being a procedure with promising potential, may be related to an increased fracture risk of the adjacent untreated vertebrae.
METHODS: A bio-realistic model of a lumbar spine is introduced to determine the morbidity of cemented augmentation. The model was verified and validated for the purpose of the study and subjected to a dynamic finite element analysis. Anisotropic bone properties and solid ligamentous tissue were considered along with α time varying loading scenario.
FINDINGS: The yielded results merit high clinical interest. Bi-pedicular filling stimulated a symmetrically developing stress field, thus comparing favourably to uni-pedicular augmentation which resulted in a non-uniform loading of the spine segment. An enslavement of the load transfer was also found to both patient bone mineral density and reinforcement-nucleous pulpous superimposition.
INTERPRETATION: The investigation presented refined insight into the dynamic biomechanical response of a reinforced spine segment. The increase in the calculated occurring stresses was considered as non-critical in most cases, suggesting that prevalent fractures are a symptomatic condition of osteoporosis rather than a sequel of efficiently preformed kyphoplasty.
METHODS: A bio-realistic model of a lumbar spine is introduced to determine the morbidity of cemented augmentation. The model was verified and validated for the purpose of the study and subjected to a dynamic finite element analysis. Anisotropic bone properties and solid ligamentous tissue were considered along with α time varying loading scenario.
FINDINGS: The yielded results merit high clinical interest. Bi-pedicular filling stimulated a symmetrically developing stress field, thus comparing favourably to uni-pedicular augmentation which resulted in a non-uniform loading of the spine segment. An enslavement of the load transfer was also found to both patient bone mineral density and reinforcement-nucleous pulpous superimposition.
INTERPRETATION: The investigation presented refined insight into the dynamic biomechanical response of a reinforced spine segment. The increase in the calculated occurring stresses was considered as non-critical in most cases, suggesting that prevalent fractures are a symptomatic condition of osteoporosis rather than a sequel of efficiently preformed kyphoplasty.