Journal of neurosurgery. Spine · 2024
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus the anterior transcorporeal approach for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rajjoub Rami, Nguyen Ryan, Ghaith Abdul Karim, El-Hajj Victor Gabriel, De Biase Gaetano, Onyedimma Chiduziem, Yolcu Yagiz U, Jarrah Ryan, Elmi-Terander Adrian, Akinduro Oluwaseun O, Abode-Iyamah Kingsley, Bydon Mohamad
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Surgical decompression is often indicated for symptomatic cases of cervical radiculopathy. In the cervical spine, minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MIS-PCF) and the anterior transcorporeal approach (ATCA) are modern techniques available to surgeons. This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aimed to assess surgical and patient-reported outcomes of MIS-PCF and ATCA for cervical radiculopathy.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using 1) Ovid; 2) Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations; and 3) Scopus databases, which reported outcomes following cervical decompression using MIS-PCF or the ATCA. Specifically, baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, and changes in visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score were assessed. The quality of the studies was graded using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
RESULTS: Forty studies with 1661 patients were identified. The comparative analysis of both techniques revealed no significant differences in complication (7%, 95% CI 5%-10%, p = 0.75) or reoperation rates (5%, 95% CI 3%-7%, p = 0.41). Additionally, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss (55.39, 95% CI 44.62-66.16 ml, p = 0.55) or operative time (85.15, 95% CI 65.38-104.92 minutes, p = 0.05). The ATCA showed significantly greater improvement (p < 0.01) in VAS neck pain scores following surgery (ATCA point reduction 6.7, 95% CI 6.0-7.5 points vs MIS-PCF 3.0, 95% CI 1.0-5.0 points).
CONCLUSIONS: The ATCA and MIS-PCF are effective modern techniques for the surgical treatment of radiculopathy. Both approaches showed comparable postoperative outcomes, including complication and reoperation rates. However, the ATCA was shown to provide significantly greater improvement in VAS neck pain scores.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using 1) Ovid; 2) Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations; and 3) Scopus databases, which reported outcomes following cervical decompression using MIS-PCF or the ATCA. Specifically, baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, and changes in visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score were assessed. The quality of the studies was graded using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
RESULTS: Forty studies with 1661 patients were identified. The comparative analysis of both techniques revealed no significant differences in complication (7%, 95% CI 5%-10%, p = 0.75) or reoperation rates (5%, 95% CI 3%-7%, p = 0.41). Additionally, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss (55.39, 95% CI 44.62-66.16 ml, p = 0.55) or operative time (85.15, 95% CI 65.38-104.92 minutes, p = 0.05). The ATCA showed significantly greater improvement (p < 0.01) in VAS neck pain scores following surgery (ATCA point reduction 6.7, 95% CI 6.0-7.5 points vs MIS-PCF 3.0, 95% CI 1.0-5.0 points).
CONCLUSIONS: The ATCA and MIS-PCF are effective modern techniques for the surgical treatment of radiculopathy. Both approaches showed comparable postoperative outcomes, including complication and reoperation rates. However, the ATCA was shown to provide significantly greater improvement in VAS neck pain scores.