Prediction of Skeletal Muscle Mass Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Older Adults Using Anthropometric Data.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Accurate estimation of skeletal muscle mass is a key component in the screening for sarcopenia. Anthropometric parameters provide a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative, yet their predictive capability can be enhanced with machine learning. This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict skeletal muscle mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in individuals aged 70 years and older using anthropometric measurements and demographic data.
METHODS
Anthropometric data from 984 older adults aged 70 years and older were obtained from the 8th Size Korea Human Body Measurement Survey. Data preprocessing included removing missing values, applying Min-Max scaling and selecting relevant features. Machine learning models were developed, optimised using a tuning framework and evaluated through error metrics, residual analysis and feature importance interpretation.
RESULTS
Among the machine learning models, XGBoost achieved the highest predictive accuracy (RMSE = 1.29, R2 = 0.92) while using the fewest predictors (18), demonstrating efficiency and effectiveness. Key features included calf circumference, gender, weight, height and waist circumference. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis emphasised the dominant role of calf circumference, reinforcing its predictive capability for skeletal muscle mass.
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the potential of machine learning for predicting skeletal muscle mass using non-invasive anthropometric measurements. These findings support the proposed model as a scalable and cost-effective tool for estimating skeletal muscle mass, which is a key quantitative component of sarcopenia screening.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.