Автоматизированная многокоординарная оценка мобильности с использованием приборов L-испытания (iL-испытание).
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Albites-Sanabria Jose, Palumbo Pierpaolo, D'Ascanio Ilaria, Bonci Tecla, Caruso Marco, Salis Francesca, Cereatti Andrea, Del Din Silvia, Alcock Lisa, Kuederle Arne, Paraschiv-Ionescu Anisoara, Gazit Eran, Kluge Felix, Kirk Cameron, Encarna Mico-Amigo M, Scott Kirsty, Hansen Clint, Klenk Jochen, Schwickert Lars, Megaritis Dimitrios, Vogiatzis Ioannis, Becker Clemens, Maetzler Walter, Hausdorff Jeffrey M, Caulfield Brian, Vereijken Beatrix, Rochester Lynn, Muller Arne, Mazza Claudia, Carpinella Ilaria, Bowman Thomas, De Ciechi Roberta, Torchio Alessandro, Cattaneo Davide, Bianchi Simona, Ferrarin Maurizio, Randi Pericle, Piraccini Lucrezia, Davalli Angelo, Chiari Lorenzo, Palmerini Luca
Аннотация
Оригинал публикации
Automated Multicohort Mobility Assessment With an Instrumented L-Test (iL-test).
The L-test is a performance-based measure to assess balance and mobility. Currently, the primary outcome from this test is the time required to finish it. In this study we present the instrumented L-test (iL-test), an L-test wherein mobility is evaluated by means of a wearable inertial sensor worn at the lower back. We analyzed data from 113 people across seven cohorts: healthy adults, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, Parkinson's disease, proximal femoral fracture, and transfemoral amputation. The iL-test automatic segmentation was validated using stereophotogrammetry. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on 164 kinematic features derived from inertial signals to identify distinct patterns across different cohorts. The iL-test accurately recognized and segmented activities during the L-test for all cohorts (technical validity). A random forest classifier revealed that proximal femoral fracture and transfemoral amputation induced significantly different mobility patterns compared to healthy people with AUC values of 0.89 and 0.99, respectively. Strong correlations were found between kinematic features and clinical scores in multiple sclerosis, congestive heart failure, proximal femoral fracture, and transfemoral amputation, with consistent patterns of decreased movement ranges and smoothness with increasing disease severity. Furthermore, features derived from 90° and 180° turns were found to be important contributors to differentiation amongst cohorts, underscoring the need to evaluate different turn degrees and directions. This study emphasizes the iL-test potential to deliver automated mobility assessment across a wide range of clinical conditions, indicating a prospective avenue for improved mobility assessment and, eventually, more informed healthcare interventions.