MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182634b04

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2012

Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.

Pearson Adam, Lurie Jon, Tosteson Tor, Zhao Wenyan, Abdu William, Weinstein James N

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Combined prospective randomized controlled trial and observational cohort study of spinal stenosis (SpS) with an as-treated analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine modifiers of the treatment effect (TE) of surgery (the difference between surgical and nonoperative outcomes) for SpS using subgroup analysis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial demonstrated a positive surgical TE for SpS at the group level. However, individual characteristics may affect TE. No previous studies have evaluated TE modifiers in SpS.

METHODS

SpS patients were treated with either surgery (n = 419) or nonoperative care (n = 235) and were analyzed according to treatment received. Fifty-three baseline variables were used to define subgroups for calculating the time-weighted average TE for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) over 4 years (TE = ΔODIsurgery - ΔODInonoperative). Variables with significant subgroup × treatment interactions (P < 0.05) were simultaneously entered into a multivariate model to select independent TE predictors.

RESULTS

Other than smokers, all analyzed subgroups including at least 50 patients improved significantly more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated: baseline ODI ≤ 56 (TE -15.0 vs. -4.4, ODI > 56, P < 0.001), not smoking (TE -11.7 vs. -1.6 smokers, P < 0.001), neuroforaminal stenosis (TE -14.2 vs. -8.7 no neuroforaminal stenosis, P = 0.002), predominant leg pain (TE -11.5 vs. -7.3 predominant back pain, P = 0.035), not lifting at work (TE -12.5 vs. -0.5 lifting at work, P = 0.017), and the presence of a neurological deficit (TE -13.3 vs. -7.2 no neurological deficit, P < 0.001) were associated with greater TE.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of smokers, patients who met strict inclusion criteria improved more with surgery than with nonoperative treatment, regardless of other specific characteristics. However, TE varied significantly across certain subgroups, and these data can be used to individualize shared decision making discussions about likely outcomes. Smoking cessation should be considered before surgery for SpS.

Для цитирования: Pearson Adam, Lurie Jon, Tosteson Tor, Zhao Wenyan, Abdu William, Weinstein James N. Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT.. Spine. 2012. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182634b04.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.