MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a39646

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2009

Prevalence of vertebral pars defects (spondylolysis) in a population with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Verra Wiebe C, Pruijs Hans J, Beek Erik J, Castelein René M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study of spinal roentgenograms of a large cohort of patients suffering from osteogenesis imperfecta.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of vertebral pars defects (spondylolysis) in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients suffering from osteogenesis imperfecta are known to be prone to pathologic fractures. Pathologic fractures due to microtraumas, repetitive activities, and posture acting together on a congenitally weakened pars interarticularis may lead to vertebral pars defects. The prevalence of vertebral pars defects in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta has never been studied before to our knowledge.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of posterior-anterior and lateral, standing, roentgenograms of the spine of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta for the occurrence of vertebral pars interarticularis defects.

RESULTS

The patients (5.3%) in our series showed vertebral pars defects, this is not significantly different from the prevalence of vertebral pars defects in the general population.

CONCLUSION

5.3% of the patients with osteogenesis imperfecta showed vertebral pars defects, this does not differ significantly from the occurrence in the general population.

Для цитирования: Verra Wiebe C, Pruijs Hans J, Beek Erik J, Castelein René M. Prevalence of vertebral pars defects (spondylolysis) in a population with osteogenesis imperfecta.. Spine. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181a39646.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.