MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01202412-199605020-00007

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B · 1996

Is gentle manipulative reduction and percutaneous fixation with a single screw the best management of acute and acute-on-chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A report of 70 patients.

de Sanctis N, Di Gennaro G, Pempinello C, Corte S D, Carannante G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report the results of the management of acute and acute-on-chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) for 70 patients (81 hips) with an average follow-up of 6 years (range 1-15 years). We clinically reviewed 51 patients (55 hips) with acute or acute-on-chronic slip treated in our department from 1978 to 1993 with clinical and radiographic examination. Of these, 10 patients (11 hips) underwent a three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scan to provide more details of the remodeling process. Percutaneous pinning with one cannulated screw appears to offer significant advantages. It is stable, safe, and reliable; there is no blood loss; the scar is small; hospital stay is brief; and early weightbearing is possible 2 weeks after the procedure, with low incidence of complications. Last, but not least, children can soon return to school. We conclude that preoperative reduction with very gentle manipulation and percutaneous pinning with a single screw is the best treatment for SCFE.

Для цитирования: de Sanctis N, Di Gennaro G, Pempinello C, Corte S D, Carannante G. Is gentle manipulative reduction and percutaneous fixation with a single screw the best management of acute and acute-on-chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A report of 70 patients.. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B. 1996. DOI: 10.1097/01202412-199605020-00007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.