Journal of nephrology · 2024
Outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: role of triggers and complement abnormalities in the response to C5 inhibition.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ardissino Gianluigi, Cresseri Donata, Mancuso Maria Cristina, Capone Valentina, Porcaro Luigi, Amico Valeria, Tangredi Marianna, Grovetti Elena, Griffini Samantha, Castellano Giuseppe, Montini Giovanni, Consonni Dario, Cugno Massimo, HUS-ItalKid Network.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Atypical-hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy often due to uncontrolled complement activation, characterized by high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Eculizumab has improved the outcome, however, its efficacy varies among patients and its discontinuation is debated.
METHODS: To identify characteristics associated with treatment response, we analyzed 244 aHUS patients referred to our center. Patients were classified according to the presence/absence of complement abnormalities and/or triggers at onset in 4 categories: (1) primary (complement abnormality without trigger), (2) secondary (trigger without complement abnormality), (3) combined (trigger and complement abnormality), (4) idiopathic (no trigger, no complement abnormality). Response to treatment was evaluated by comparing the response to eculizumab with that of conventional therapy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated with the relapse rate after discontinuation of C5-inhibition.
RESULTS: Patients had a better outcome with eculizumab compared to conventional treatment, with a response rate of 81.9% vs 56.9%, p < 0.001 and a long-term cumulative incidence of ESKD of 5.8% vs 22.5% (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.80). The excellent global response was driven by the primary and combined groups (89.8% vs 54.0% and 89.3% vs 54.2%, respectively). The relapse rate following discontinuation of the C5-inhibitor was as high as 66.7% in the primary group, 18.7% in the combined, and 0% in the secondary and idiopathic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a better outcome in aHUS patients treated with C5-inhibition, particularly in the primary and combined forms, which have a high risk of relapse after discontinuation that is not observed in the secondary and idiopathic forms.
METHODS: To identify characteristics associated with treatment response, we analyzed 244 aHUS patients referred to our center. Patients were classified according to the presence/absence of complement abnormalities and/or triggers at onset in 4 categories: (1) primary (complement abnormality without trigger), (2) secondary (trigger without complement abnormality), (3) combined (trigger and complement abnormality), (4) idiopathic (no trigger, no complement abnormality). Response to treatment was evaluated by comparing the response to eculizumab with that of conventional therapy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated with the relapse rate after discontinuation of C5-inhibition.
RESULTS: Patients had a better outcome with eculizumab compared to conventional treatment, with a response rate of 81.9% vs 56.9%, p < 0.001 and a long-term cumulative incidence of ESKD of 5.8% vs 22.5% (hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.80). The excellent global response was driven by the primary and combined groups (89.8% vs 54.0% and 89.3% vs 54.2%, respectively). The relapse rate following discontinuation of the C5-inhibitor was as high as 66.7% in the primary group, 18.7% in the combined, and 0% in the secondary and idiopathic groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a better outcome in aHUS patients treated with C5-inhibition, particularly in the primary and combined forms, which have a high risk of relapse after discontinuation that is not observed in the secondary and idiopathic forms.