Journal of pediatric orthopedics · 2023
The Effect of Epiphysiodesis on the Longitudinal Bone Growth of Hands or Feet in Children With Macrodactyly Based on Long-term Quantitative Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Woo Soo Jin, Jung Jae Hoon, Choi Jun Ho, Kim Yumin, Kwon Sung Tack, Kim Byung Jun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Treatment protocols for macrodactyly have not been elucidated due to its rarity and variety of clinical manifestations. This study aims to share our long-term clinical results of epiphysiodesis in children with macrodactyly.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 17 patients with isolated macrodactyly treated with epiphysiodesis over 20 years. Length and width of each phalanx in both the affected finger and the corresponding unaffected finger in the contralateral hand were measured. Results were presented in ratios of the affected to unaffected side for each phalanx. Measuring of length and width of phalanx was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 months, and the last follow-up session. Postoperative satisfaction scoring was done with visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 7 years and 2 months. In the proximal phalanx, length ratio significantly decreased compared with preoperative state at after more than 24 months, in the middle phalanx after 6 months, in the distal phalanx after 12 months. When classified by the growth patterns, the progressive type showed significant decrease in length ratio at after 6 months, and the static type after 12 months. Patients were overall satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSION: Epiphysiodesis effectively regulated longitudinal growth with different degree of control for different phalanges in the long-term follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 17 patients with isolated macrodactyly treated with epiphysiodesis over 20 years. Length and width of each phalanx in both the affected finger and the corresponding unaffected finger in the contralateral hand were measured. Results were presented in ratios of the affected to unaffected side for each phalanx. Measuring of length and width of phalanx was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6, 12, and 24 months, and the last follow-up session. Postoperative satisfaction scoring was done with visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 7 years and 2 months. In the proximal phalanx, length ratio significantly decreased compared with preoperative state at after more than 24 months, in the middle phalanx after 6 months, in the distal phalanx after 12 months. When classified by the growth patterns, the progressive type showed significant decrease in length ratio at after 6 months, and the static type after 12 months. Patients were overall satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSION: Epiphysiodesis effectively regulated longitudinal growth with different degree of control for different phalanges in the long-term follow-up.