MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bpo.0000000000003145

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric orthopedics · 2025

Routine Removal of Orthopaedic Implants in Pediatric Trauma Patients With Fracture Union: Who, When, and Why.

Ihnow Stephanie, Raymond Brittany, Horodyski MaryBeth, Baez Catalina, McQuerry Jessica, Wallace Austin W

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: While the indications and options expand for treatment of pediatric fractures with metallic implants, routine removal of implants remains controversial. There is a paucity of randomized prospective trials to determine the risk of retention versus removal. Prior studies provided insight into the preferences of POSNA members versus their nonpediatric counterparts; however, they did not capture specifics regarding timing, anatomic location, implant type, or patient age. This study aims to report POSNA members' practice habits regarding the routine removal of orthopaedic implants after fracture union.

METHODS

This is an IRB-approved online survey of POSNA members regarding the routine removal of orthopaedic trauma implants after fracture union. The questionnaire consisted of 6 parts: demographics, implant removal with consideration of patient age and time since implantation, the most common reason for removal, the most common complications of removal, and a comment section.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-five POSNA members responded to at least 1 implant-related question. Flexible nails were the most commonly removed implants (90.8% for the forearm, 87.3% for the femur, 86.3% for the tibia, and 84.6% for the humerus), followed by femur plates and screws (79.9%). The least likely implants to be routinely removed were clavicle plates and screws (31.6%), femur rigid nails (32.6%), and tibial tubercle screws (37.1%). There was a lower likelihood of implant removal in patients older than nine. Upper extremity implants tended to be removed earlier than lower extremity implants (between 7 and 9 mo vs. 10 and 12 mo postimplantation). The most cited reasons for removal included routine practice (mean 43%) and symptomatic hardware (mean 32%), while the least selected reason was evidence-based research (mean 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of routine implant removal in pediatric trauma patients after fracture union range from 90.8% for flexible forearm nails to 31.6% for clavicle plates and screws. Removal typically occurs between 7 and 12 months postimplantation. As patients age, surgeons are less inclined to remove implants. There was minimal consensus on the rationale for routine removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Для цитирования: Ihnow Stephanie, Raymond Brittany, Horodyski MaryBeth, Baez Catalina, McQuerry Jessica, Wallace Austin W. Routine Removal of Orthopaedic Implants in Pediatric Trauma Patients With Fracture Union: Who, When, and Why.. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000003145.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.