MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/brs.0000000000004357

Медицинская библиотека · Spine · 2022

Robotic Spine Surgery: Past, Present, and Future.

Perfetti Dean C, Kisinde Stanley, Rogers-LaVanne Mary P, Satin Alexander M, Lieberman Isador H

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to present an overview of robotic spine surgery (RSS) including its history, applications, limitations, and future directions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The first RSS platform received United States Food and Drug Administration approval in 2004. Since then, robotic-assisted placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws has been extensively studied. More recently, expanded applications of RSS have been introduced and evaluated.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Cochrane, OVID-MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed for articles relevant to robotic spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed.

RESULTS

The placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using RSS is safe and accurate and results in reduced radiation exposure for the surgeon and surgical team. Barriers to utilization exist including learning curve and large capital costs. Additional applications involving minimally invasive techniques, cervical pedicle screws, and deformity correction have emerged.

CONCLUSION

Interest in RSS continues to grow as the applications advance in parallel with image guidance systems and minimally invasive techniques.

IRB APPROVAL: N/A.

Для цитирования: Perfetti Dean C, Kisinde Stanley, Rogers-LaVanne Mary P, Satin Alexander M, Lieberman Isador H. Robotic Spine Surgery: Past, Present, and Future.. Spine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004357.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.