MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/036354659302100603

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of sports medicine · 1993

The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy. A prospective study.

Oberlander M A, Shalvoy R M, Hughston J C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination for intraarticular injuries of the knee was documented by arthroscopy over a 6-month period. Two-hundred ninety patients (296 knees) were evaluated by history, physical examination, and standard radiographs. Supplemental diagnostic studies included 41 magnetic resonance images, 2 arthrograms, and 1 previous arthroscopy that had been recently performed. Overall, the correct diagnosis was made in 165 knees (56%), an incomplete diagnosis in 92 (31%), and an incorrect diagnosis in 39 (13%). There were only 2 knees (0.07%) with no discernable lesions. When a single lesion was present in the knee, the diagnosis was made correctly in 72% of cases. When more than 2 were discovered, the diagnosis was correct in only 30%. However, all individual lesions were diagnosed with an accuracy of greater than 90%. The lesions most difficult to diagnose were chondral fractures, fibrotic fat pads, tears in the anterior cruciate ligament, and loose bodies. Knees with acute lesions and those with a single diagnosis proved to be significantly easier to diagnose (P < 0.01). The variables that proved to be insignificant were age, sex, magnetic resonance imaging, surgeon, workers' compensation, or pending litigation.

Для цитирования: Oberlander M A, Shalvoy R M, Hughston J C. The accuracy of the clinical knee examination documented by arthroscopy. A prospective study.. The American journal of sports medicine. 1993. DOI: 10.1177/036354659302100603.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.