Journal of pediatric surgery · 2023
Successful Treatment of Fibro-Adipose Vascular Anomaly with Sirolimus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Zuopeng, Yan Hanlei, Ding Yingjing, Gong Ying, Ma Yangyang, Yao Wei, Li Kai
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to present our initial experience in using sirolimus therapy to treat fibro-adipose vascular anomaly (FAVA).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eight patients with FAVA who were treated with sirolimus at our hospital between July 2017 and October 2020.
RESULTS: Six girls (75%) and two boys (25%) were included in the cohort; the average age was 8 years (range, 1-13 years). Vascular tumors developed mainly on the extremities, including the forearm (n = 2; 25.0%), calf (n = 4; 50.0%), and thigh (n = 2; 25.0%). The predominant symptoms included swelling of the lesion (n = 8; 100%), pain (n = 7; 87.5%), contracture (n = 3; 37.5%), and phlebectasia (n = 3; 37.5%). Magnetic resonance imaging was the primary method used for FAVA diagnosis, and all patients underwent enhanced MRI. All lesions were heterogeneous with hyperintense T1 signals. The fat-suppressed T2-weighted images also revealed heterogeneous hyperintense masses, thus indicating fibrofatty infiltration. All eight patients received a sirolimus treatment regimen after FAVA diagnosis. One patient underwent tumor resection but experienced recurrence, whereas the other six patients underwent biopsy. Histological examination revealed that the lesions consisted of fibrofatty tissue with abnormal venous channels and anomalous lymphatic vascular components. Sirolimus softened the masses and caused tumor shrinkage within 5.25 ± 2.6 weeks (range, 2-10 weeks) after treatment initiation. The tumors also involuted rapidly and became stable within 7.75 ± 2.25 months after treatment initiation (range, 6-12 months). All seven patients experiencing pain reported relief within 3.8 ± 1.8 weeks (range, 2-7 weeks) after initiation of sirolimus therapy. Sirolimus alleviated but did not fully resolve the contracture in three patients. Remarkably, five patients exhibited a complete response, and three patients exhibited a partial response. At the time of the last follow-up, three patients had begun to gradually taper off sirolimus after 24 months of treatment and maintained a low blood sirolimus concentration. No serious adverse effects were observed during treatment.
CONCLUSION: FAVA is a complex vascular malformation that appears to respond well to sirolimus treatment. Thus, sirolimus may be an effective and safe treatment for FAVA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL IV.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eight patients with FAVA who were treated with sirolimus at our hospital between July 2017 and October 2020.
RESULTS: Six girls (75%) and two boys (25%) were included in the cohort; the average age was 8 years (range, 1-13 years). Vascular tumors developed mainly on the extremities, including the forearm (n = 2; 25.0%), calf (n = 4; 50.0%), and thigh (n = 2; 25.0%). The predominant symptoms included swelling of the lesion (n = 8; 100%), pain (n = 7; 87.5%), contracture (n = 3; 37.5%), and phlebectasia (n = 3; 37.5%). Magnetic resonance imaging was the primary method used for FAVA diagnosis, and all patients underwent enhanced MRI. All lesions were heterogeneous with hyperintense T1 signals. The fat-suppressed T2-weighted images also revealed heterogeneous hyperintense masses, thus indicating fibrofatty infiltration. All eight patients received a sirolimus treatment regimen after FAVA diagnosis. One patient underwent tumor resection but experienced recurrence, whereas the other six patients underwent biopsy. Histological examination revealed that the lesions consisted of fibrofatty tissue with abnormal venous channels and anomalous lymphatic vascular components. Sirolimus softened the masses and caused tumor shrinkage within 5.25 ± 2.6 weeks (range, 2-10 weeks) after treatment initiation. The tumors also involuted rapidly and became stable within 7.75 ± 2.25 months after treatment initiation (range, 6-12 months). All seven patients experiencing pain reported relief within 3.8 ± 1.8 weeks (range, 2-7 weeks) after initiation of sirolimus therapy. Sirolimus alleviated but did not fully resolve the contracture in three patients. Remarkably, five patients exhibited a complete response, and three patients exhibited a partial response. At the time of the last follow-up, three patients had begun to gradually taper off sirolimus after 24 months of treatment and maintained a low blood sirolimus concentration. No serious adverse effects were observed during treatment.
CONCLUSION: FAVA is a complex vascular malformation that appears to respond well to sirolimus treatment. Thus, sirolimus may be an effective and safe treatment for FAVA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL IV.