International orthopaedics · 2021
Distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy is a viable treatment option for hallux valgus with metatarsus adductus-multicentre retrospective study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jaehyung, Lee Ho Seong, Jeong Jae-Jung, Seo Dong-Kyo, Kee Taehong, So Sangpil, Choi Young Rak
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with hallux valgus (HV) with concomitant metatarsus adductus (MA) treated with distal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (DCMO), without any procedure for the second or third metatarsal.
METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study involving four hospitals was conducted. A total of 45 feet from 38 patients who had received DCMO for HV with MA with at least one year post-operative follow-up were analysed. HV angle (HVâ), inter-metatarsal angle (IMâ), MA angle (MAâ), and the lateral sesamoid grade were measured. Foot function index (FFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded. Patients were divided into mild (18° ≤ MAâ < 20°) and moderate (20° ≤ MAâ) MA groups, and results were compared.
RESULTS: The mean HVâ and IMâ improved significantly from 35.1° and 14.4° pre-operatively to 10.6° and 7.1° one year post-operatively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative HVâ, IMâ, or the sesamoid grade, and also no difference in post-operative HVâ or the sesamoid grade between mild and moderate MA groups. Only the mean post-operative IMâ showed a difference between the two groups (8.3° vs. 6.3°; p = 0.019). All clauses of FFI and VAS improved significantly (p < 0.001). When the extent of improvement was compared between the two groups, there were no significant differences in any category (p > 0.05). The total rate of recurrence (HVâ ≥ 20°) was 11.1% (5/45), and although the moderate group (4/29, 13.8%) had a higher proportion than the mild group (1/16, 6.3%), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.641).
CONCLUSION: DCMO for patients with HV with MA had satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes with minimal recurrence. Except in cases of severe combined deformity, we recommend performing DCMO alone without any additional procedure or manipulation of the other metatarsals as a viable treatment option.
METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study involving four hospitals was conducted. A total of 45 feet from 38 patients who had received DCMO for HV with MA with at least one year post-operative follow-up were analysed. HV angle (HVâ), inter-metatarsal angle (IMâ), MA angle (MAâ), and the lateral sesamoid grade were measured. Foot function index (FFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded. Patients were divided into mild (18° ≤ MAâ < 20°) and moderate (20° ≤ MAâ) MA groups, and results were compared.
RESULTS: The mean HVâ and IMâ improved significantly from 35.1° and 14.4° pre-operatively to 10.6° and 7.1° one year post-operatively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative HVâ, IMâ, or the sesamoid grade, and also no difference in post-operative HVâ or the sesamoid grade between mild and moderate MA groups. Only the mean post-operative IMâ showed a difference between the two groups (8.3° vs. 6.3°; p = 0.019). All clauses of FFI and VAS improved significantly (p < 0.001). When the extent of improvement was compared between the two groups, there were no significant differences in any category (p > 0.05). The total rate of recurrence (HVâ ≥ 20°) was 11.1% (5/45), and although the moderate group (4/29, 13.8%) had a higher proportion than the mild group (1/16, 6.3%), this was not statistically significant (p = 0.641).
CONCLUSION: DCMO for patients with HV with MA had satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes with minimal recurrence. Except in cases of severe combined deformity, we recommend performing DCMO alone without any additional procedure or manipulation of the other metatarsals as a viable treatment option.