DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078034
Sarcopenia in systemic sclerosis: prevalence and impact-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This review aims to provide an estimate of sarcopenia prevalence and its impact on clinical characteristics in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systemically searched from inception to 24 May 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included observational studies that reported the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with SSc.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction using standardised methods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.
RESULTS
A total of 4583 articles were screened and 9 studies with data from 815 patients were included in the analysis (8 cross-sectional studies and 1 retrospective cohort study). The overall prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with SSc was 22% (95% CI 17% to 28%). Patients with SSc with sarcopenia had a poorer quality of life (mean difference -12.02; 95% CI -19.11 to -4.93) and higher C reactive protein (CRP) levels (standardised mean difference 0.67; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.00).
CONCLUSIONS
Sarcopenia is common in patients with SSc. Patients with SSc with sarcopenia had a worse quality of life and higher CRP levels, based on our findings. Given the detrimental impact of sarcopenia on quality of life, future efforts aimed at early identification of sarcopenia in the clinical assessment of patients with SSc may have significance.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022368326.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.