DOI 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.08.005
A report of 21 cases of rheumatoid arthritis following Chikungunya fever. A mean follow-up of two years.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
In 2005, after an epidemic infection of Chikungunya fever in islands in the Indian Ocean, infected patients exhibited severe musculoskeletal disorders. We report 21 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after Chikungunya infection that were diagnosed at a rheumatological centre in Reunion Island.
METHODS
Patients were examined by the same rheumatologist from February 2006 to July 2007. Inclusion criteria were (1) Chikungunya infection confirmed by IgM and IgG antibodies, (2) RA according to ACR criteria, (3) no other definite diagnosis of arthritis and (4) persistent arthritis symptoms from the onset of viral infection to RA diagnosis.
RESULTS
Twenty-one patients (13 females; mean age, 57+/-12 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients (85.7%) had symmetric polyarthritis and three had oligoarthritis. The mean symptom duration was 10 months (range 4-18). The mean ESR was 40.7+/-28.1 mm/hr and C-reactive protein level 37+/-41 mg/l; 12 patients were positive for rheumatoid factor (57.1%), and six had anti-CCP antibodies (28.6%) and 14 HLA DRB1*04 or 01 alleles (66.6%). Radiographs of hands and feet of 12 patients showed erosions and/or joint space narrowing (JSN). During a mean follow-up of 27.6+/-6.4 months, all patients were treated with DMARDs including methotrexate (n=19) and TNF blockers (n=6). Structural damage progressed, with 17 cases of erosion and/or JSN at follow-up.
CONCLUSION
We diagnosed RA in 21 patients with Chikungunya fever. The first symptoms occurred at the time of viral infection. Outcome was severe in most of the cases despite low rate of anti-CCP antibodies. These cases suggest a role of viral infection in RA initiation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.