MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00016480802620639

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2009

Outcomes of type II thyroplasty for adductor spasmodic dysphonia: analysis of revision and unsatisfactory cases.

Sanuki Tetsuji, Isshiki Nobuhiko

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONCLUSION

The factors responsible for the observed failures can be broken into two major groups: (1) a wrong indication and (2) an inadequate technique to achieve relief from an excessively tight glottal closure. The use of a titanium bridge in place of a silicone shim was found to be essential. Type II thyroplasty can relieve the symptoms of adductor spasmodic dysphonia (AdSD) when implemented with a modern technique using titanium bridges.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factor or factors that necessitated revision surgery in type II thyroplasty for AdSD, detailed analytical examinations were made of individual cases with unsatisfactory outcomes.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a case series with follow-up periods of 2-5 years.

RESULTS

Ninety AdSD patients underwent type II thyroplasty. The results in one patient were limited because a pathological mechanism other than AdSD was also involved. One patient, a singer, who wanted a more intense voice for singing was dissatisfied with the results. In three patients, the material used for fixation was inadequate. In two other patients, the method of application of the fixative material was found to be insufficient as it did not include both the upper and lower sides.

Для цитирования: Sanuki Tetsuji, Isshiki Nobuhiko. Outcomes of type II thyroplasty for adductor spasmodic dysphonia: analysis of revision and unsatisfactory cases.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2009. DOI: 10.3109/00016480802620639.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.