MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Japanese journal of infectious diseases · 2004

An epidemiological analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains in a university hospital.

Caylan Rahmet, Kaklikkaya Nese, Aydin Kemalettin, Aydin Faruk, Yilmaz Gurdal, Ozgumus Birol, Koksal Iftihar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the epidemiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a university hospital of Turkey. From June 2000 to December 2001, S. maltophilia strains were collected, clinical presentations were noted, and MIC determinations were performed by means of E-test. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences-PCR (ERIC-PCR) was used for molecular typing of the strains. Forty-four strains of S. maltophilia were isolated from 41 hospitalized patients in a teaching hospital. The majority of specimens were from the blood and respiratory tract. Antimicrobial sensitivities of these strains were as follows: 97.7 % trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 15.9% ticarcillin, and 95.4% ticarcillin- clavulanate. The strains were evaluated using the ERIC-PCR method. It was of interest to note that epidemiological typing revealed three small outbreaks that were caused by a total of 12 strains. The remaining isolates generated singular DNA patterns. DNA amplification was possible in 38 isolates and yielded 26 different patterns in a period of 20 months, leading to the suggestion that commensal bacteria becomes selected in the presence of a suitable host.

Для цитирования: Caylan Rahmet, Kaklikkaya Nese, Aydin Kemalettin, Aydin Faruk, Yilmaz Gurdal, Ozgumus Birol, Koksal Iftihar. An epidemiological analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains in a university hospital.. Japanese journal of infectious diseases. 2004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.