Knee laxity in anterolateral complex injuries versus lateral meniscus posterior horn injuries in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND

In the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee, additional injury of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and capsule may increase the pathologic laxity. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the anterolateral complex (ALC) injury in ACL injured knee with the effects of lateral meniscus posterior horn (LMPH) meniscectomy.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used. After testing the (1) intact knees and (2) ACL sectioned knees (ACL-), two groups were established: an (3) ALC sectioning group (n = 5), which underwent additional ALC sectioning (ACL-/ALC-) after ACL sectioning, and a separate (3) LMPH meniscectomy group (n = 5) that underwent LMPH meniscectomy (ACL-/LMPH-) after ACL sectioning. Knee laxity was measured in terms of internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation for each condition at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°.

RESULTS

After additional sectioning of the ALC (ACL-/ALC-), the mean internal rotation at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of knee flexion was 11.9 ± 1.3°, 18.1 ± 1.6°, 18.3 ± 1.8°, and 17.8 ± 2.4°, respectively, showing significant internal rotation laxity when compared to the intact knee (P = .031, .020, .001 and .033). Anterior translation also significantly increased compared to the ACL- knee at 30° (12.7 ± 1.4 to 16.8 ± 1.7 mm: P = .039). In contrast, additional meniscectomy of the LMPH (ACL-/LMPH-) significantly increased valgus laxity compared to the intact knee at 30, 60 and 90° (P = .021, .018 and .024).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the anterolateral complex, which include the ALL and anterolateral capsule, may play an important role in stabilizing the knee against internal rotation and anterior translation.