Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2019
Molecular Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Thymus.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dinter Helen, Bohnenberger Hanibal, Beck Julia, Bornemann-Kolatzki Kirsten, Schütz Ekkehard, Küffer Stefan, Klein Lukas, Franks Teri J, Roden Anja, Emmert Alexander, Hinterthaner Marc, Marino Mirella, Brcic Luka, Popper Helmut, Weis Cleo-Aron, Pelosi Giuseppe, Marx Alexander, Ströbel Philipp
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The WHO classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is also used to classify thymic NETs (TNETs) into typical and atypical carcinoid (TC and AC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and small cell carcinoma (SCC), but little is known about the usability of alternative classification systems.
METHODS: One hundred seven TNET (22 TC, 51 AC, 28 LCNEC, and 6 SCC) from 103 patients were classified according to the WHO, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and a grading-related PNET classification. Low coverage whole-genome sequencing and immunohistochemical studies were performed in 63 cases. A copy number instability (CNI) score was applied to compare tumors. Eleven LCNEC were further analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing. Morphologic classifications were tested against molecular features.
RESULTS: Whole-genome sequencing data fell into three clusters: CNIlow, CNIint, and CNIhigh. CNIlow and CNIint comprised not only TC and AC, but also six LCNECs. CNIhigh contained all SCC and nine LCNEC, but also three AC. No morphologic classification was able to predict the CNI cluster. Cases where primary tumors and metastases were available showed progression from low-grade to higher-grade histologies. Analysis of LCNEC revealed a subgroup of intermediate NET G3 tumors that differed from LCNEC by carcinoid morphology, expression of chromogranin, and negativity for enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2).
CONCLUSIONS: TNETs fall into three molecular subgroups that are not reflected by the current WHO classification. Given the large overlap between TC and AC on the one hand, and AC and LCNEC on the other, we propose a morphomolecular grading system, Thy-NET G1-G3, instead of histologic classification for patient stratification and prognostication.
METHODS: One hundred seven TNET (22 TC, 51 AC, 28 LCNEC, and 6 SCC) from 103 patients were classified according to the WHO, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and a grading-related PNET classification. Low coverage whole-genome sequencing and immunohistochemical studies were performed in 63 cases. A copy number instability (CNI) score was applied to compare tumors. Eleven LCNEC were further analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing. Morphologic classifications were tested against molecular features.
RESULTS: Whole-genome sequencing data fell into three clusters: CNIlow, CNIint, and CNIhigh. CNIlow and CNIint comprised not only TC and AC, but also six LCNECs. CNIhigh contained all SCC and nine LCNEC, but also three AC. No morphologic classification was able to predict the CNI cluster. Cases where primary tumors and metastases were available showed progression from low-grade to higher-grade histologies. Analysis of LCNEC revealed a subgroup of intermediate NET G3 tumors that differed from LCNEC by carcinoid morphology, expression of chromogranin, and negativity for enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2).
CONCLUSIONS: TNETs fall into three molecular subgroups that are not reflected by the current WHO classification. Given the large overlap between TC and AC on the one hand, and AC and LCNEC on the other, we propose a morphomolecular grading system, Thy-NET G1-G3, instead of histologic classification for patient stratification and prognostication.