MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jnnp.2007.121699

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2007

Psychiatric comorbidity in patients with spasmodic dysphonia: a controlled study.

Gündel H, Busch R, Ceballos-Baumann A, Seifert E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To study the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity assessed by a structured clinical interview in patients with spasmodic dysphonia (SD) compared with patients suffering from vocal fold paralysis (VFP).

METHODS

In 48 patients with SD and 27 patients with VFP, overall psychiatric comorbidity was studied prospectively using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders. Physical disability and psychometric variables were assessed with standardised self-rating questionnaires.

RESULTS

41.7% of SD subjects and 19.5% of the control group met DSM-IV clinical criteria for current psychiatric comorbidity (p<0.05). Significant predictors of psychiatric comorbidity in SD were severity of voice impairment and subjective assessment of "satisfaction with health". As a limitation, the severity of voice impairment in patients with SD was nearly twice as high, and their illness had lasted nearly twice as long.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with SD. The significant correlation between current psychiatric comorbidity and the extent of voice pathology may point to an especially strong interaction between somatic and psychiatric complaints in SD.

Для цитирования: Gündel H, Busch R, Ceballos-Baumann A, Seifert E. Psychiatric comorbidity in patients with spasmodic dysphonia: a controlled study.. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2007. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.121699.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.