Comparison of Interventions for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the literature and systematically evaluate outcomes for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament interventions including anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), laminoplasty (LP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to March 2021. Patient demographic data, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, cervical lordosis and overall complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 30 studies involving 2038 patients. Patients undergoing ACCF had improved Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores compared with patients undergoing LP (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.85) and LF (WMD 1.21, 95% CI 0.17-2.24). Patients with ACAF had better cervical lordosis compared with patients with ACCF (WMD 7.00, 95% CI 0.72-13.27), LP (WMD 10.27, 95% CI 4.64-15.90), and LF (WMD 8.98, 95% CI 2.48-15.47). Additionally, ACAF (odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.84) and LP (odds ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.90) had a lower incidence of complications compared with ACCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese Orthopaedic Association score outcomes indicated that ACCF was superior to LP and LF. ACAF had the largest cervical lordosis among all procedures. ACCF showed a higher incidence of overall complications compared with ACAF and LP.