Biomaterials advances · 2024
Assessment of the advantages and limitations of an innovative silk fibroin scaffold for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with preclinical in vitro and in vivo evaluations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giavaresi Gianluca, Sartori Maria, Baleani Massimiliano, Brogini Silvia, Erani Paolo, Dallari Dante, Del Piccolo Nicolandrea, Ghezzi Chiara E, Martini Lucia, Parrilli Annapaola, Boschi Alessandra, Tanzi Maria Cristina, Alessandrino Antonio, Fini Milena, Freddi Giuliano, Farè Silvia
Аннотация
The gold standard treatment in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction involves autologous tissue transplantation, but this can have complications. Artificial grafts are an alternative, but the best option is debated. This study aimed to assess the biocompatibility and integration of a silk fibroin textile prosthesis (SF-TP) with peri-implant bone tissue and the native ACL. Twenty-six sheep underwent ACL reconstruction with SF-TP or autologous femoral fascia lata (FFL). Sheep were divided into two groups (3 and 6 months) and retrieved joints processed for histological, morphometrical and mechanical analysis. In vitro, SF-TP showed no cytotoxicity and good cell interaction up to 14 days. Histology revealed fibro-vascular tissue around SF-TP, with a progressive attempt of ligamentous-like tissue formation at 6 months. However, SF-TP group had higher joint damage scores. Micro-CT showed tunnel enlargement in SF-TP group, while FFL group had a decrease. SF-TP reconstructions had lower stiffness and strength (44 % and 64 % decrease) than those of autologous FFL reconstruction and often failed by pull-out from the bone tunnel due to tunnel enlargement. These results indicate poor osteointegration and graft motion with SF-TP, leading to joint damage/bone resorption and reduced mechanical competence. These results do not support the use of SF-TP for ACL reconstruction.