Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2011
Skeletal differences in patients with temporomandibular joint disc displacement according to sagittal jaw relationship.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Il-Hyung, Moon Beom-Seok, Lee Seung-Pyo, Ahn Sug-Joon
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The present study was designed to analyze the skeletal differences in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement (DD), according to the sagittal jaw relationship.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a cross-sectional study design and enrolled a sample of Korean women older than age 17 years. The subjects were classified into 3 groups according to the magnetic resonance images of the bilateral TMJs: bilateral normal disc position (BN), bilateral disc displacement with reduction, and bilateral disc displacement without reduction. Each group was subdivided into 2 groups using the mandibular body length to anterior cranial base ratio as a sagittal jaw parameter: normal-size mandible (NM) and oversized mandible (OM). Seventeen variables from the lateral cephalograms were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance to analyze the differences in skeletal characteristics with respect to the mandible size and TMJ DD status.
RESULTS: The subjects with TMJ DD generally had a short ramus height and clockwise rotation of the ramus and mandible compared with those with BN in both OM and NM groups. However, significant differences were present in the skeletal characteristics of the TMJ DD patients between the NM and OM groups. Significant backward positioning and rotation of the ramus and mandible were found between BN and bilateral disc displacement with reduction or bilateral disc displacement without reduction in the OM group, while those of the ramus and mandible were found between BN and bilateral disc displacement with reduction or bilateral disc displacement without reduction in the NM group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the skeletal characteristics associated with TMJ DD are differently represented according to the sagittal jaw relationship.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a cross-sectional study design and enrolled a sample of Korean women older than age 17 years. The subjects were classified into 3 groups according to the magnetic resonance images of the bilateral TMJs: bilateral normal disc position (BN), bilateral disc displacement with reduction, and bilateral disc displacement without reduction. Each group was subdivided into 2 groups using the mandibular body length to anterior cranial base ratio as a sagittal jaw parameter: normal-size mandible (NM) and oversized mandible (OM). Seventeen variables from the lateral cephalograms were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance to analyze the differences in skeletal characteristics with respect to the mandible size and TMJ DD status.
RESULTS: The subjects with TMJ DD generally had a short ramus height and clockwise rotation of the ramus and mandible compared with those with BN in both OM and NM groups. However, significant differences were present in the skeletal characteristics of the TMJ DD patients between the NM and OM groups. Significant backward positioning and rotation of the ramus and mandible were found between BN and bilateral disc displacement with reduction or bilateral disc displacement without reduction in the OM group, while those of the ramus and mandible were found between BN and bilateral disc displacement with reduction or bilateral disc displacement without reduction in the NM group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the skeletal characteristics associated with TMJ DD are differently represented according to the sagittal jaw relationship.