[Spondylodiscitis. Analysis of 25 cases].
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Spondylodiscitis is a rare but prolonged inflammation of two adjacent vertebral bodies and the disk in between.
AIM: To report the clinical features of a series of patients with spondylodiscitis.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with spondylitis, identified between 1989 and 2002.
RESULTS
A total of 25 cases were identified, 15 female, aged 49.8 years as a mean. Their mean evolution before admission was 4.3 months. Main complaints were back or radicular pain. Mild anemia was present in most patients. Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein values were 66 mm/h and 60 mg/L, respectively. Forty four percent of patients had neurological complications. Vertebral computed tomography and scintigraphic studies were done in 72% of patients, but magnetic resonance imaging was done only in 4 (16%). In 18 patients, a tissue sample for pathological and microbiological analysis, was obtained by imaging guiding or surgically. Tuberculosis, diagnosed on pathology, was the leading cause of spondylitis in nine cases (36%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus infection in five (20%). Other agents found were E coli and group D Streptococcus (one each). Age, symptoms, evolution time and different laboratory parameters did not differ between patients with tuberculosis and patients with other causes. A microbiological cause was not established in 36% of cases. Most patients evolved satisfactorily and recovered from neurological complications (88%). One patient with tuberculosis did not improve after prolonged treatment and 2 patients infected with S aureus died (8%).
CONCLUSIONS
Spondylodiscitis is associated to a diversity of microbial agents and in most cases has a favorable prognosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.