MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.18999/nagjms.86.4.711

Медицинская библиотека · Nagoya journal of medical science · 2024

Adolescent thoracic scoliosis due to giant ganglioneuroma: a two-case report and literature review.

Dinh Hoai Thi Phuong, Yamato Yu, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Yoshida Go, Banno Tomohiro, Arima Hideyuki, Oe Shin, Ide Koichiro, Yamada Tomohiro, Kurosu Kenta, Matsuyama Yukihiro

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Ganglioneuromas are rare benign tumors that arise from the sympathetic nervous system. The presentation of tumors is variable and associated with adolescent thoracic scoliosis. Herein, we present two case reports and a review of literature. The two cases involved 10 and 13-year-old patients who were asymptomatic for muscle pain or weakness, and ganglioneuromas were incidentally detected through imaging screening. Both patients underwent a two-stage surgery. The first stage involved detachment of the tumor from the spinal cord and simultaneously performing deformity correction surgery from the posterior aspect. The second stage was resection of the ganglioneuroma through the anterior approach without neurological problems. A two-stage surgery was necessary to excise the tumor and correct the deformity, thereby avoiding neurological problems and concurrently establish a pathological diagnosis. Commencing with the posterior approach proved to be safe and was more effective.

Для цитирования: Dinh Hoai Thi Phuong, Yamato Yu, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Yoshida Go, Banno Tomohiro, Arima Hideyuki, Oe Shin, Ide Koichiro, Yamada Tomohiro, Kurosu Kenta, Matsuyama Yukihiro. Adolescent thoracic scoliosis due to giant ganglioneuroma: a two-case report and literature review.. Nagoya journal of medical science. 2024. DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.86.4.711.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.