Clinical and experimental rheumatology · 2018
Efficiency of dose reduction strategy of etanercept in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lian Fan, Zhou Jun, Wang Yu, Chen Dongying, Xu Hanshi, Liang Liuqin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of different tapering or discontinuation strategies of etanercept in a cohort of axial spondyloarthritis from South China.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. Axial SpA patients who achieved clinical remission for at least 6 months after receiving a standard dose of etanercept therapy were enrolled. Different tapering or discontinuation strategies were compared.
RESULTS: Altogether, 258 cases were enrolled. No differences were found in baseline characteristics among the three groups. Significantly more patients on discontinuation group (19%) than tapering group (5.4%, p<0.001) relapsed as early as 6 months. Almost all of the patients (103/107, 96.3%) in taper 25% group and more than 80% (71/88, 80.7%) of the patients in taper 50% group maintained low disease activity (LDA) or clinical remission during the first year. At the end of the 2-year follow-up, the percentage of patients maintaining LDA or remission were 28.6% (discontinuation), 55.7% (taper 50%), 84.1% (taper 25%), respectively. Activity indexes were significantly lower in taper 25% group compared to the other two groups. Patients in discontinuation group and tapering 50% group, with longer SpA duration were more likely to relapse, and remission>12 months before discontinuation/tapering helped to reduce relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to slowly increase the dosing interval and transit to the lowest effective dosing interval for some patients in remission/LDA. Prolonging the time under remission before tapering help to improve the outcome. Tapering 25% of the etanercept dose every 3 months may be a pragmatic approach for more cost-effective use of the drug.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. Axial SpA patients who achieved clinical remission for at least 6 months after receiving a standard dose of etanercept therapy were enrolled. Different tapering or discontinuation strategies were compared.
RESULTS: Altogether, 258 cases were enrolled. No differences were found in baseline characteristics among the three groups. Significantly more patients on discontinuation group (19%) than tapering group (5.4%, p<0.001) relapsed as early as 6 months. Almost all of the patients (103/107, 96.3%) in taper 25% group and more than 80% (71/88, 80.7%) of the patients in taper 50% group maintained low disease activity (LDA) or clinical remission during the first year. At the end of the 2-year follow-up, the percentage of patients maintaining LDA or remission were 28.6% (discontinuation), 55.7% (taper 50%), 84.1% (taper 25%), respectively. Activity indexes were significantly lower in taper 25% group compared to the other two groups. Patients in discontinuation group and tapering 50% group, with longer SpA duration were more likely to relapse, and remission>12 months before discontinuation/tapering helped to reduce relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to slowly increase the dosing interval and transit to the lowest effective dosing interval for some patients in remission/LDA. Prolonging the time under remission before tapering help to improve the outcome. Tapering 25% of the etanercept dose every 3 months may be a pragmatic approach for more cost-effective use of the drug.