Comparison of Transarticular Screw Fixation and C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Atlantoaxial Instability.

BACKGROUND

Many surgical procedures have been introduced to manage atlantoaxial instability caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to prevent complications and improve fusion rate. We report the surgical outcome between transarticular screw fixation (TAF) and C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw fixation (C1LM-C2P) in patients with atlantoaxial instability from RA.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2012, 58 patients were enrolled in the study. According to surgical procedures, patients were divided into 2 groups: group I who received TAF (n = 33) and group II who received C1LM-C2P (n = 25). Bony fusion was assessed by radiologic comparison immediately after the operation and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, complications and clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, bone fusion was achieved in 32 patients in group I (97%). In group II, the fusion rate was evaluated in 100% of patients. Complications (regardless of neurologic deterioration) were cable loosening and screw malposition in group I and violation into the vertebral canal and spinal canal in group II. There was no statistical significance in fusion rate, clinical outcomes, or complications. The 12-month atlantodental interval after operation for the C1LM-C2P group was significantly lower than that for the TAF group after adjusting for all variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Two surgical techniques showed a good fusion rate by rigid fixation in the immediate postoperative period and fewer surgery-related complications in patients with RA. Because surgical complications are more likely during the learning curve (as with other surgical techniques), surgeons should carefully evaluate patients before surgery by radiologic and neurologic examinations.