MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.114

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2024

Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Spine Surgeons in Surgical Decision-Making and Radiological Assessment for Spine Pathologies.

Almekkawi Ahmad K, Caruso James P, Anand Soummitra, Hawkins Angela M, Rauf Rayaan, Al-Shaikhli Mayar, Aoun Salah G, Bagley Carlos A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of large language models (LLMs), specifically ChatGPT and Claude, in surgical decision-making and radiological assessment for spine pathologies compared to experienced spine surgeons.

METHODS

The study employed a comparative analysis between the LLMs and a panel of attending spine surgeons. Five written clinical scenarios encompassing various spine pathologies were presented to the LLMs and surgeons, who provided recommended surgical treatment plans. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging images depicting spine pathologies were analyzed by the LLMs and surgeons to assess their radiological interpretation abilities. Spino-pelvic parameters were estimated from a scoliosis radiograph by the LLMs.

RESULTS

Qualitative content analysis revealed limitations in the LLMs' consideration of patient-specific factors and the breadth of treatment options. Both ChatGPT and Claude provided detailed descriptions of magnetic resonance imaging findings but differed from the surgeons in terms of specific levels and severity of pathologies. The LLMs acknowledged the limitations of accurately measuring spino-pelvic parameters without specialized tools. The accuracy of surgical decision-making for the LLMs (20%) was lower than that of the attending surgeons (100%). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in accuracy between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the potential of LLMs in assisting with radiological interpretation and surgical decision-making in spine surgery. However, the current limitations, such as the lack of consideration for patient-specific factors and inaccuracies in treatment recommendations, emphasize the need for further refinement and validation of these artificial intelligence (AI) models. Continued collaboration between AI researchers and clinical experts is crucial to address these challenges and realize the full potential of AI in spine surgery.

Для цитирования: Almekkawi Ahmad K, Caruso James P, Anand Soummitra, Hawkins Angela M, Rauf Rayaan, Al-Shaikhli Mayar, Aoun Salah G, Bagley Carlos A. Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Spine Surgeons in Surgical Decision-Making and Radiological Assessment for Spine Pathologies.. World neurosurgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.114.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.