MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.12.012

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics · 2020

Inter-tester Reliability of Lumbar Lordosis Posture Classification Using a Novel Screening Device.

Shin Sun-Shil, Yoo Won-Gyu

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the inter-tester reliability of lumbar lordosis posture using a novel screening device.

METHODS

A total of 33 healthy young male participants participated in the study. Two examiners measured the regional upper and lower lumbar lordosis angles of the participants in the standing position using a flexible ruler. The bent flexible ruler maintained a fixed shape and was transferred to a protractor for angle measurement. Two examiners classified each participant into one of 4 lumbar spine categories and measured the upper and lower regional lumbar lordosis angles.

RESULTS

The agreement level between the 2 examiners in assessing healthy participants was 87.9%. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.79 (95% CI = 0.86-0.97), reflecting a substantial level of agreement.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that our novel screening device for assessing upper and lower lumbar angles showed good inter-tester reliability in posture classification. Our findings may be useful for health care professionals for managing sagittal lumbar posture in asymptomatic younger individuals; however, more testing is still needed.

Для цитирования: Shin Sun-Shil, Yoo Won-Gyu. Inter-tester Reliability of Lumbar Lordosis Posture Classification Using a Novel Screening Device.. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.12.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.