MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13018-019-1106-0

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019

Scar overlapping suture for treating chronic tendinous mallet finger in children.

Zhang Lei, Zuo Yu-Ming, Huo Yong-Xin, Wang Guo-Qiang, Zhang Liu

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of scar overlapping suture for treating chronic tendinous mallet finger deformity in children.

METHODS

Six patients younger than 18 years were investigated retrospectively. The active extensor lags of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) were all more than 40°, and the passive ranges of DIPJ motion were normal. They were all treated surgically by scar overlapping suture technique, featuring careful overlapping suture of the extensor scar and temporary transarticular Kirschner wire fixation of the DIPJ.

RESULTS

Average follow-up was 3.1 years (ranging from 2 to 5 years). All patients made significant improvement in DIPJ activity. Three patients achieved full active DIPJ extension, whereas one patient had a 10° extensor lag and two patients had 5° extensor lags. All patients achieved normal active flexion ranges and full passive motion ranges of DIPJ compared with their uninjured side. There was no bone dysplasia, pain, or deformity recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Scar overlapping suture for treating chronic tendinous mallet finger in children is safe and effective. According to the Crawford criteria, all patients were graded as excellent.

Для цитирования: Zhang Lei, Zuo Yu-Ming, Huo Yong-Xin, Wang Guo-Qiang, Zhang Liu. Scar overlapping suture for treating chronic tendinous mallet finger in children.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1106-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.