The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2026
Tongue swab Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing for TB using a revised consensus protocol.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ajide B, Moe C A, Barrameda J, Chirwa M, Rockman L, de Haas P, de Vos M, Kato-Maeda M, Tasca B, Bimba J, Yu C, Denkinger C M, Kremer K, Nahid P, Cattamanchi A, Theron G, Muyoyeta M
Аннотация
<sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>Tongue swabs are a promising specimen type for TB diagnosis. In a previous study, using a consensus protocol, tongue swabs tested with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra outperformed sputum smear microscopy, but a substantial proportion (6.1%) of results were non-actionable (e.g., invalid/error). We evaluated a revised protocol for tongue swab Xpert Ultra testing in four high-burden countries.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>Participants aged ≥12 years with presumptive TB were enrolled from outpatient clinics in the Philippines, South Africa, Nigeria, and Zambia. Tongue swabs were processed using Sample Reagent (SR, Cepheid, USA) diluted 2:1 with phosphate buffer or phosphate-buffered saline and tested with Xpert Ultra. Diagnostic performance was assessed against culture-based microbiological reference standard and compared to sputum tests.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>From March to November 2024, 1,168 participants were enrolled (median age 37 [IQR: 28-48] years; 46.7% female; 21.8% living with HIV; 18.5% culture-confirmed TB). The proportion of non-actionable tongue swab results was 5.6% overall, but <4% in all countries except South Africa (15.4%). Tongue swab sensitivity was 66.0% (95% CI: 59.0-72.5); specificity was 99.6% (95% CI: 98.9-99.9).</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title>The revised protocol yielded low error rates at most sites and moderate sensitivity, supporting tongue swabs as an alternative specimen for Xpert Ultra testing when sputum is unavailable.</sec>.