Types and doses of anti-adhesive agents injected into subacromial space do not have an effect on the clinical and anatomical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: Joint stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Various antiadhesive agents are commonly administered after rotator cuff repair for its prevention. This study aimed to compare the outcomes among patients injected with different types and amounts of anti-adhesive agents after rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized that the outcomes might differ depending on the use of the anti-adhesive agent and its type and dose.

METHODS

A total of 267 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without subacromial injection of anti-adhesive agents were enrolled. The first group (group A; 51 patients) were injected with 3 mL of poloxamer/sodium alginate-based anti-adhesive agent. The second group (group B; 93 patients) were injected with 3 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. The third group (group C; 82 patients) were injected with 1.5 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. Finally, the last group (group D; 41 patients) who did not use anti-adhesive agents served as the control. The range of motion (ROM) and pain VAS scores were measured preoperatively and at 5 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores, whereas cuff integrity was assessed via MRI or ultrasonography at least 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

All ROM measurements, pain VAS scores, and functional scores were significantly improved regardless of the use, type, and dose of the anti-adhesive agents. In addition shoulder ROM and rotator cuff healing did not significantly differ among the groups (all n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in the clinical and anatomical outcomes according to the type and dose of the anti-adhesive agents subacromially injected after rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.