MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0264-410x(97)00114-x

Медицинская библиотека · Vaccine · 1997

Twenty-three-year follow-up study of rubella antibodies after immunization in a closed population, and serological response to revaccination.

Asahi T, Ueda K, Hidaka Y, Miyazaki C, Tanaka Y, Nishima S

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Twenty-six institutionalized children immunized with a Japanese rubella vaccine, Matsuba strain, have been observed for 23 years and the persistence of vaccine-induced rubella immunity documented. All vaccinees were shown to have seroconverted to rubella virus in a haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test, and the geometric mean titre (GMT) of rubella HI antibody rose to 2 5-8 months after vaccination (Ueda et al., Acta Paediatrica Japonica, Overseas Edition 1978, 20, 8-14). The GMT then declined gradually to 2 23 years after inoculation, except in four cases (15.4%) which had reverted to negative. However, three of the four maintained a rubella HI antibody titre of 1:4. Twelve of the 26 vaccinees were revaccinated 24 years after primary vaccination, and all ten cases having initial titres of < or = 1:16 demonstrated secondary responses. Rubella immunity induced by vaccination had persisted, so routine booster immunization did not seem necessary. However, a second immunization programme should be considered to achieve high antibody-positive rates and to protect against primary vaccine failure.

Для цитирования: Asahi T, Ueda K, Hidaka Y, Miyazaki C, Tanaka Y, Nishima S. Twenty-three-year follow-up study of rubella antibodies after immunization in a closed population, and serological response to revaccination.. Vaccine. 1997. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(97)00114-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.